'Evidence Based Management Essay\r'

' employ evidences or facts to run the governance is not a new concept in the attention practice. Some managers use their experiences, research, articles and other evidences conducted by business experts to make endings in their physical composition. Using these evidences to nominate solutions to solve problems in the plaque is known as evidence-based management (EBMgt). For the power of EBMgt, this decisionâ€making process has few advantages in its implementation. Creating a frank feel decision is a linear suffice with an improvement of data and teaching that atomic number 18 used as decision supports. Having dependable evidences and using systematic process, managers can create a better managerial and organizational decisions. In this good purlieu, organizations also bequeath perform with a flexible management in implementing all decisions because they are resulted from many good researches. Finally, this model also forget create a learning environment for ma nagers to improve their competence to make a good decision. For the opponent of EBMgt, this practice is embarrassing to be implemented in the organization because some reasons. Sometimes, it seems too much information for managers to consider as decision supports.\r\nFurthermore, from those data, managers frequently feel difficult to pick the secure information. When managers think that they have a good evidence, sometimes they cannot use it as their decision support because it is not relevant to their organization in certain conditions. Lastly, managers frequently revert into the wrong business practice because a half-done solution that is offered by consultants. After that, managers frequently see other consulting firms to try misleading. To empathise more deeply nearly EBMgt, allow’s see an example of PT KAI, the Indonesian state-owned ships company that operate railways. Since the exit four years, management of PT KAI has changed the company from getting loss US D 8.5 gazillion in 2008 to having profit more than USD 45 Million in 2013.\r\nThe remarkable change in the company could not be unconnected from many innovations that has been applied by its management. In 2009, the management did some researches and survey about the company’s problems causing the lack of revenue. After that, they found two briny issues that were human resources and services problem. To solve the head start problem, the management applied the meritocracy system in its human resources system.\r\n'